Fealty: ” the loyalty of a feudal tenant or vassal to his lord. These public chiefs aren’t free specialists but instead act like they are individuals from a clique, surrendered to self-hurt. The UN blends the enchanted mixture that is energetically consumed, changing over them into worldwide resident/slaves. If the U.S. were to quit subsidizing the UN, it would crease like a deck of cards. — Technocracy News and Patterns Manager Patrick Wood
Posted By: Judi Sherman through The Gold Report
On September 22nd, dignitaries from around the world will accumulate at the Unified Countries central command in New York for a gathering called Culmination Representing things to come.
At the gathering, scene pioneers will sign Settlement for the Future, an understanding in which part states will vow their faithfulness to the UN as a focal, binding together government.
The opening sentence of the document reads, “We, the Heads of State and Government, representing the peoples of the world, have gathered at United Nations Headquarters to protect the needs and interests of present and future generations through the actions in this Pact for the Future.”
“We perceive that the multilateral framework and its organizations, with the Unified Countries and its Contract at the middle, should be reinforced to stay up with an impacting world.”
Part states then more than once “reaffirm” their “relentless responsibility” to the UN, its contract, its motivations, its standards, and Plan 2030. They commitment to agree with the UN’s Global Official courtroom and vow to “change the worldwide monetary design.”
The treaty states, “An important step toward building greater trust in the multilateral system is reform of the international financial architecture.” We compliment continuous change endeavors and call for much more earnest and aggressive activity to guarantee that the global monetary design turns out to be more productive, more fair, fit for the universe of today and receptive to the difficulties looked by non-industrial nations in shutting the SDG funding hole. The change of the worldwide monetary design ought to put the 2030 Plan at its middle, with a steady obligation to putting resources into the destruction of neediness in the entirety of its structures and aspects.”
By and large, the archive records 60 moves that part states ought to initiate. The agreement makes it abundantly clear that the nations’ interests are centered on the United Nations and its globalist systems in nearly all of them.
The document’s last clause requires member states to incorporate UN “agreements and resolutions” into their national laws:
A UN official: The United Nations wants to establish a single political identity. The most recent draft of the treaty was released the same week that a UN official was caught on camera saying that the organization wants to establish a single world government with its own military power.
The comments were accidentally made by Jorge Paulette, a partner lawful official in the UN Office of Legitimate Issues’ settlement area. Paulette didn’t realize that the individual he was talking with was a covert columnist from Mug Club Secret and was subtly recording everything.
They made this organization [the UN] which is the nearest we’ve at any point got to similar to a world government. A world state.”
“Like a one-world government?” the correspondent inquired.
Paoletti responded, “Exactly.”
The Unified Countries, in the most natural sounding way for Paulette, tries to be a globalist world government that standards over Earth’s residents, every one of whom would be compelled to stick to a uniform character.
“One of the targets of the UN is to make a character of a worldwide resident . . . of someone who has a political identity that is shared by everyone on the planet,” he said.
Paoletti regretted, nonetheless, that the UN isn’t quite as compelling as it ought to be — however this could change assuming the association had military power.
“The Unified Countries doesn’t have its own military,” Paulette said